Collecting data on ethnicity (and often also race) is widespread globally and often regarded as a way of tracking and mitigating discrimination and other forms of inter-group inequalities. Not so in Europe (e.g. Simon 2012; European Commission 2017). Most European countries have opted to exclude not only race, but also ethnic categories from national censuses or population registers.
In this paper, we argue, that there are several hitherto overlooked both moral and epistemic costs of not collecting data on ethnicity.
We first respond to the idea that in fact there is no dearth of data at all since ethnicity is already accounted for by more generally acceptable categories like immigrant, or country of birth. We argue that these are not at all obvious proxies at all because they either entirely miss or fail to distinguish epistemically relevant information. Further, we highlight how the use of alternative categories to ethnicity can lead to certain “slippages” or ambiguities in meaning: where concepts like “immigrant”, function as “code” for different ethnic or racial categories, while also retaining a more literal and often more encompassing interpretation.
In addition to scrutinizing the epistemic and moral arguments, we adopt an experimental philosophy approach to addressing the by conducting small experiments with online respondents. First, we explore whether individuals use “immigrant” as a proxy for “Muslim” (or “Arab”) when deciding whether to discriminate or not. Second, we experimentally evaluate whether individuals provide differential support for the same arguments when they concern gender as opposed to ethnicity to test whether ethnicity is indeed a more sensitive category that should not be probed or registered (as is commonly assumed).
Marion Godman is Associate Professor at the Department of Political Science at Aarhus University and an affiliated scholar of the History and Philosophy of Science department, Cambridge University. Between 2012 and 2018 she was also based at Helsinki University working at TINT/Centre of Excellence in Philosophy of the Social Sciences. She works on a range of issues that concerns the philosophy of the human and social sciences and in political philosophy and endeavours to find a synthesis between these different areas as can be seen in her research monograph, The Epistemology and Morality of Human Kinds (2020, Routledge).
Helsinki Institute for Social Sciences and Humanities (HSSH) organizes a weekly Brown Bag Seminar to highlight novel methodological approaches in humanities and social sciences. Bring your own lunch, we bring fresh methodological topics!
There will be a 20-minute introduction to the methodological theme, followed by an open discussion of 40 minutes. The seminars are open to everybody. We expect a multidisciplinary and methodologically curious audience from different faculties and units of the central campus. The most important prerequisite for participation is not methodological expertise, but an open mind towards new methodological innovations and discussion across methodological and disciplinary boundaries.
Please join us on Wednesday 9.4. at 12.15 to listen and discuss!
You are welcome to join us at our seminar room 524 Fabianinkatu 24 A (access via door, not courtyard), 5th floor or online via zoom.
You’ll find more information and the zoom link on the event website.
Tapahtuma-ajat
- Alkaa:
- 9.4.2025 12:15
- Loppuu:
- 9.4.2025 13:15
- Tapahtumapaikka:
- HSSH Seminar Room & Zoom
- Osoite:
- Fabianinkatu 24 A, 5. krs, huone 524
- Postitoimipaikka:
- Helsinki
- Etätapahtuma nimi:
- Zoom
- Etätapahtuma osoite:
- Avaa verkkosivut
Tapahtuman muut tiedot
- Tapahtuman tyyppi:
- Esitelmät ja keskustelutilaisuudet
- Kuvaajan tiedot:
- Veikko Somerpuro
- Verkkosivut:
- Avaa verkkosivut
- Yhteyshenkilö:
- Anna Jarske-Fransas
- Sähköpostiosoite: